Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida vs Karl William Wurth Mac-Leay Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Almeida vs Mac-Leay analysis and find out who is favored!
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida vs Karl William Wurth Mac-Leay Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Almeida 1 - 0 Mac-Leay
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Almeida has won 47.84% of points on their second serve, while Mac-Leay has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Almeida, in recent form, has won 50.72% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mac-Leay has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.14% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Almeida has saved 62.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mac-Leay has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Almeida has won 44.68% of matches played (W/L 21/ 26), with Mac-Leay winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Almeida has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 154/ 103), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Mac-Leay has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 28% (W/L 14/ 36), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Almeida has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.19% of matches (W/L 19/ 24), where as Mac-Leay has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Almeida winning 1 times and Mac-Leay being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Almeida winning 2 and Mac-Leay winning 0. The last match between Almeida and Mac-Leay was at the Brazil F7 (Sao Carlos), 27-10-2018, Q1 round, Clay with Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Almeida and Mac-Leay have played a deciding set 0 times, with Almeida winning 0 times and Mac-Leay 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Almeida winning 0, and Mac-Leay 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Almeida has played against opponents with an average rank of 281.28 while Mac-Leay has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Almeida has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mac-Leay has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Almeida has converted 48.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mac-Leay has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
330
Rank
190
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
59% (176-122)
Career Total W/L
27% (14-38)
56% (10-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$57,890
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida | Karl William Wurth Mac-Leay |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida | Karl William Wurth Mac-Leay |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (10/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (24/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (207/185) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (10/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 50 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 55 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:4 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 276.67 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (827/1337) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (556/827) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (244/510) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (59/122) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (539/1274) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (10/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 69% (13/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Gianluca Mager
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
44
Total Points Won
44
|
4-6 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Liam Draxl
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
46 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
109
|
3-6 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Orlando Luz
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
41%
(
28 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
73%
(
64 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
52 of
100)
106
Total Points Won
82
|
5-7 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Andrea Collarini
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Karl William Wurth Mac-Leay Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lars Goran Verwerft
Player
Karl William Wurth Mac-Leay
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Acevedo
Player
Karl William Wurth Mac-Leay
47%
(
20 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Almeida Vs Mac-Leay Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
